Canada: éliminer les foetus anormaux: la menace dune vielle idéologie
A growing demand for "perfect children" is leading to the elimination of unborn babies with health problems. The Globe and Mail newspaper reported Oct. 28 that the number of children born with cystic fibrosis has fallen sharply in recent years.
According to research published in the Journal of Pediatrics, currently 1 in 3,608 babies born in suffer from cystic fibrosis, compared with 1 in 2,714 before a genetic test for this disease existed. "Our hypothesis," Mary Corey, a senior scientist at the Hospital for Sick Children in
The article also noted that testing is set to increase notably. Officials in
Genetic screening is also on the rise in . The London-based Telegraph newspaper reported July 11 that a method of screening embryos for hemophilia has been developed.
British doctors at the
And on Aug. 19 the Times reported that a clinic in
The Times reported that groups defending the rights of embryos criticized the approval. The groups argued that it would lead to the destruction of embryos that might be perfectly healthy, along with others that could go on with a high chance of a normal life once their tumor were treated.
The license to conduct the screening went to Paul Serhal, of
In , meanwhile, controversy over the use of genetic screening to eliminate babies broke out when a bioethicist argued that parents have a moral obligation to use this technology to bear "the best child possible."
The Age newspaper reported June 5 on the comments made by Melbourne-born Julian Savulescu. He is now the head of
Savulescu was in
He also argued in favor of using screening to test for desirable character traits. "I think we've got a reason for using (tests) not just to screen out diseases, but in looking at the kind of characteristics our children are likely to have," he told the Age. He said that traits such as empathy, sympathy and fair-mindedness could create more moral people.
Criticism of Savulescu came from Robert Sparrow, of
"There'll be large pressure on parents to have perfect babies where what counts as a perfect baby is determined by majority opinion," Sparrow said. "Parents will pretty quickly work out for themselves that unless they have the nice, intelligent, tall, blond-haired, blue-eyed child, their child is going to be less successful in society than other children."
As well, if the birth of children with disabilities becomes perceived as reflecting a choice of the parents, social attitudes could change and become less tolerant toward the disabled.
Sanger's legacy
Support for eugenics has a long history. One of the most influential advocates in modern times was the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger. A 2005 book, "Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility," examined her role and the influence it still has.
The carefully researched book, with 75 pages of notes and bibliography, argues that Sanger (1883-1966) had "a genuine commitment to the eugenic ideology."
Sanger's achievements, observes author Angela Franks, has led many feminists to see her "as a paragon of female achievement against an oppressive order." Many feminists also consider her as a bringer of freedom, the freedom to control female fertility, Franks states.
Yet, Franks queries how this image fits in with someone who participated actively in the eugenics movement and, among other policies, advocated forced sterilization. Sanger's vision of liberation for women "was too severely infected with a mindset of oppressive control to be able to promote true female liberation," Franks argues.
Women's liberation, for Sanger, did not mean the freedom for every woman to decide, freely, the number of children she desired to have. Rather, it meant sexual freedom for the "fit."
The corollary of this vision is that certain classes of people should not be parents and, if they would not embrace this childless state voluntarily, it should be forced upon them. This view persisted throughout Sanger's life and to this end Franks cites from a letter written by Sanger in 1955.
Controlling women
In the letter Sanger insists that birth control should be used as a restriction "for the betterment of the family and the race." This continues even today, notes Franks, as contraception is still being used to control women.
Sanger's eugenic attitudes have been institutionalized and perpetuated. This is not to say, Franks clarifies, that individual supporters of Planned Parenthood are eugenicists. But there has not been a sufficient reflection and rejection of this heritage of eugenics in organizations devoted to birth control, leading to a "lingering elitist bigotry," the author contends.
"Knowingly or not," Planned Parenthood "continues by its words and actions to perpetuate eugenic beliefs about the poor and about the disabled, albeit modulated to sound more sweetly to contemporary ears," Franks states.
The author also says that she writes her book "as a feminist who fears the ideologically compromised feminism which Sanger bequeathed to and, due to the great power that population controllers have around the world, to all women."
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, No. 2270, stipulates that human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. "From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person -- among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life."
In No. 2274 the Catechism asks that the embryo be treated as a person, and defended in its integrity. Prenatal diagnosis is morally licit, the Catechism adds, but only "if it respects the life and integrity of the embryo and the human fetus and is directed toward its safe guarding or healing as an individual." It adds: "[A] diagnosis must not be the equivalent of a death sentence." It makes no exemptions for the sake of producing perfect children.
www.zenit 20051112
Quality of Life - Bruxelles - Novembre 2005